Compiz fusion for windows vista

I use it on Debian and Compiz is really, really cool! A very needed revamp to an neverending OS like XP, but further proof of the failure that is the Aero concept in Vista. Nimi Visuals can be the next generation effects for windows. You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email.

Compiz Fusion in Windows? Share this: Twitter Facebook. Like this: Like Loading It enables you to move or resize windows, to switch workspaces, to switch windows easily using alt-tab or so , and so on. There are two release series of Compiz available that differ in certain technical respects although functionally almost identical. Plugins built for one series will not work with the other. The latest stable release of the Compiz 0. Check the wiki page for more details on the somewhat troubled project history.

Compiz Fusion is the result of a merge between the well-known Beryl composite window manager and Compiz Extras, a community set of improvements to the Compiz composite window manager. Compiz Fusion aims to provide an easy and fun-to-use windowed environment, allowing use of the graphics hardware to render each individual window and the entire screen, to provide some impressive effects, speed and usefulness. Where does that fit into all of these labels and classifications that Microsoft has put on Vista computers?

What specifically do those labels mean to consumers? Normally, I would expect that they mean exactly what they say, that the computers with this label will run Windows Vista Basic well, and may not run all features of other flavors of Vista, but honestly, you can't understand what each label means and what any given computer will handle based on the labels alone because the labels don't explicitly state the facts and details about any given machine they appear on.

So, no, you can't feel safe taking any of these labels at face value without any other knowledge. The way I see it, there are 2 main things that Microsoft has the responsibility for, caving in to Intel's demands in the first place with the Vista Capable label for Intel's crappy graphics chipsets, and once committing to that poor decision, failing to make a reasonable effort of awareness about the difference between the various labels and what they mean to resellers, retailers, and consumers.

Microsoft alone is not to blame for this problem, Intel certainly started it all. But Microsoft needs to get back to treating customers like customers again. Customers may not always be right, but the customer is the customer, and it matters how they feel and how they perceive things because ultimately they pay the bills. Consumer rights in the digital age are not frivolous. Now I'd like to upgrade from Basic to Premium, but can't due to the graphics card.